Search
Close this search box.
(07) 3231 2444
Search
Close this search box.
30 October 2015

Stand and be heard: an employer’s right to appear in the QIRC

There is a tussle taking place in the Queensland Industrial Relations Commission regarding the right of an employer to be heard in an appeal by a worker against a decision of the Regulator. Two recent cases have come to very different conclusions in relation to the employer’s right to be heard.

There is a tussle taking place in the Queensland Industrial Relations Commission (QIRC) regarding the right of an employer to be heard in an appeal by a worker against a decision of the Regulator.

Two recent cases have come to very different conclusions in relation to the employer’s right to be heard.

In the first case, the QIRC found that a self-insurer and an employer did not have the right to be heard at an appeal by a worker against a decision of the Regulator. The QIRC specifically noted that there is no provision in the Workers’ Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 (WCRA) that allows for a self-insurer or an employer to be heard in an application brought by a worker for the review of a decision of the Regulator.

While the QIRC accepted that there was a body of authority supporting the discretionary power of the QIRC to make an order giving an employer (rather than a self-insurer) a right to be heard in such an appeal, the QIRC was of the opinion that it was not bound to follow the previous authority. It is also important to note that this case involved secondary issues surrounding the late filing of the application by the employer or self-insurer, specifically where the application to be heard was filed within one week of the commencement of the hearing. Accordingly, it was determined that neither the self-insurer nor the employer was able to be heard at the appeal.

However, in the second (and more recent) case the QIRC considered that an employer did have a right to be heard in an appeal by a worker. This decision was based on the Industrial Relations Act 1999 and considered the discretionary power granted under section 320 in combination with section 582 of the WCRA. The QIRC determined that there was sufficient authority in the Industrial Court of Queensland to find that the employer did have a right to be heard and that the QIRC was bound by the decisions of that Court.

These cases confirm that a self-insurer does not have a right to be heard in an appeal by a worker. However, the rights of an employer are less clear. If previous authority is followed, the QIRC does have a discretionary power to allow an employer to be heard at an appeal. However, these cases indicate the QIRC will not always follow previous authority.

Should you have any queries regarding statutory reviews or appeals, please contact a member of our team.

To read the full cases:

Brisbane City Council v Gillow and Simon Blackwood (Workers’ Compensation Regulator) [2015] QIRC 124

Fully Integrated Therapies Pty Ltd v Prior and Simon Blackwood (Workers Compensation Regulator) [2015] QIRC 137

Like this article? Share it via:

This publication is for information only and is not legal advice. You should obtain advice that is specific to your circumstances and not rely on this publication as legal advice. If there are any issues you would like us to advise you on arising from this publication, please let us know.

Stay up to date with CGW

Subscribe to our interest lists to receive legal alerts, articles, event invitations and offers.

Key contacts

brady
Brady Cockburn
Partner
Tony-Park1
Tony Park
Partner
Kim-Villis
Kim Villis
Senior Associate

Areas of expertise

Read next